Lots of slaves apparently dream of being dominated, controlled and owned "in all aspects of life" and several Masters long for a slave of that sort. But when it comes to cash slavery I've noticed that these intentions ("in all aspects of life") get blurry and I am not sure whether the Master is actually controlling the $lave or it is the other way around. What kind of slave is that who sets "terms and conditions" to his master and decides when to worship and tribute him? What kind of Master is that who only wants his $lave's money? I guess in this case there is no real ownership, control, or domination at stake. It's just the "$lave" paying his "Master" to entertain him. The "$lave" ends up controlling his "Master" and making him play "Master" in exchange of some coins. I know, I know, there is no only one single way to be in a slave/master relationship and as long as the two of them are happy and satisfied that's more than ok. I also know that most of this type of relationships are confined to the realm of fantasy and imagination. That's more than ok as well. But this gives me the feeling that not everyone really sees ownership as a state of mind "in all aspects of life", but as a role-playing game. What a shame.
A slave/sub/fag's role is to be subordinate, firstly and foremost. Respectful. Obedient. Any financial transfer in a findom Dom/sub relationship flows from those things. If money is handed over without those things, then it is unlikely to be findom.
i totally get your point, if a master does what slave wants as long as slave pays, its lame, not real master/slave relationship.. but if you pay a master so much money and he doesnot care about you, not giving you what you want, you will be frustrated as well. Its really about balance of power and trust. but its very very difficulti totally get your point, if a master does what slave wants as long as slave pays, its lame, not real master/slave relationship.. but if you pay a master so much money and he doesnot care about you, n...See more
